One of the things I liked about Tom Wolfe’s novel I Am Charlotte Simmons is the journey that one of the main characters, Jojo, takes, from ‘dumb college jock’ to athletic student of philosophy. It’s an arc that’s not that uncommon: the pursuit of excellence in sport requires careful reflection on the self; top athletes need to be psychologically mature, at least in a certain narrow way.
But it’s not a common path – and is even far less common the other way: I rarely meet serious thinkers who follow sport seriously – which is where part of the humour of the above video comes from. Perhaps it goes back to some trauma at school of being picked last in playground games – the caricature of the meek and wan philosopher who shuns the physical world for the metaphysical… Yet at this olympics we clearly have some bright sparks: the gold medal winning boat of Katherine Grainger and Anna Watkins has both studying for PhDs – one in criminology, the other in mathematics.
I love the fact that Plato was a wrestler as well as philosopher: he refused to separate out the physical and intellectual. And thinking about this while watching Jess Ennis going through her heptathlon made me think: who might win gold medal in the ‘whole person Olympiad’?
Wouldn’t it be brilliant to have a very modern decathlon made up of sport, science, mathematics, literature, art, economics, history and philosophy? The poplin shirts of Alain de Botton would surely get pulped in a boxing bout with Nigel Warburton. Clearly Grainger and Watkins have to be leading contenders for starters… but who else could give them a run? Can’t see Richard Dawkins doing much in stadium, or Usain Bolt doing much to trouble the scorers in epistemology – though I may be wrong.
We have our great athletes and top public intellectuals… but who would win in an event mixing both? It’d be brilliant fun finding out…
Click here to receive updates, and hear first about new projects