<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kester Brewin &#187; Self</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kesterbrewin.com/tag/self/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kesterbrewin.com</link>
	<description>// __ issues. in code. __ //</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:20:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s The Monster Now? &#124; Facing the Other in the Self</title>
		<link>http://www.kesterbrewin.com/2011/05/05/whos-the-monster-now-facing-the-other-in-the-self/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kesterbrewin.com/2011/05/05/whos-the-monster-now-facing-the-other-in-the-self/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kesterbrewin.com/?p=1901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting post from Brian McLaren, who, via a piece from Miroslav Volf, asks who the next &#8216;monster&#8217; will be given that Bin Laden is dead: Fear is a foolish counselor, and it is also an addictive one. As the work of Rene Girard and others makes clear, our national anxieties love to vent themselves on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://brianmclaren.net/archives/blog/who-will-be-the-next-monster-for.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_term=Brian+McLaren+Blog&amp;utm_content=Latest+Blog+Updates">Interesting post from Brian McLaren</a>, who, via a piece from Miroslav Volf, asks who the next &#8216;monster&#8217; will be given that Bin Laden is dead:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Fear is a foolish counselor, and it is also an addictive one. As the  work of Rene Girard and others makes clear, our national anxieties love  to vent themselves on some monster, real or imaginary. We can unite our  party, if not our nation, around common aggression against shared fear &#8211;  even if we can&#8217;t unite them around a common vision around shared  values.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a very good point. One &#8211; rather extreme &#8211; etymology of the word community is &#8216;co-munis&#8217; &#8211; people we build walls and fight with. We gather together in common resistance to some greater evil, and when this is vanquished &#8211; witchcraft, communism, Islamic fundamentalism, terrorism &#8211; we move on to the next thing.</p>
<p>We need something to fear, because without this external fear, we would have no choice but to face the real monster: the monster within.</p>
<p>Christopher Booker&#8217;s work on why we tell stories outlines this progression well. The Three Billy-Goats Gruff is a children&#8217;s story about facing an external orge&#8230; but as we move into more serious stories, the orge turns out to be the &#8216;self&#8217; that we need to face.</p>
<p>This is one of the key questions I&#8217;ve tried to address in &#8216;Other&#8217; &#8211; a book I&#8217;m pleased the Brian is a big fan of. We need to address the other within the self before we can properly address the problems of engaging the &#8216;other others&#8217; who exist externally.</p>
<p>That &#8216;the West&#8217; and &#8216;Islamic extremism&#8217; have risen in opposition to one another suggests that they are both experiencing some kind of existential crisis. The west is really not convinced by the spiritual vacuousness of consumer capitalism, and Islamic extremists are not convinced that the Arab / Middle East construct is anything like what Mohammed envisaged. Both need to look within themselves, and somehow try to resolve their problems without conflict with each other.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kesterbrewin.com%2F2011%2F05%2F05%2Fwhos-the-monster-now-facing-the-other-in-the-self%2F&amp;title=Who%26%238217%3Bs%20The%20Monster%20Now%3F%20%7C%20Facing%20the%20Other%20in%20the%20Self"><img src="http://www.kesterbrewin.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kesterbrewin.com/2011/05/05/whos-the-monster-now-facing-the-other-in-the-self/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Monk and The Academic: How to be Happy</title>
		<link>http://www.kesterbrewin.com/2010/02/09/the-monk-and-the-academic-how-to-be-happy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kesterbrewin.com/2010/02/09/the-monk-and-the-academic-how-to-be-happy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KB</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kesterbrewin.com/?p=1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting piece in The Times yesterday about the meeting of two of the happiest men in the world. Well, one of them &#8211; the monk Matthieu Ricard -  is apparently the happiest (on average, surely &#8211; I doubt he&#8217;s ever been happier than me when United won the Champions League in the last minute of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kesterbrewin.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/happy.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1167" title="happy" src="http://www.kesterbrewin.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/happy.jpg" alt="happy" width="500" height="380" /></a> Interesting piece in <a href="http://ow.ly/14Y4s"><em>The Times</em></a> yesterday about the meeting of two of the happiest men in the world. Well, one of them &#8211; the monk Matthieu Ricard -  is apparently the happiest (on average, surely &#8211; I doubt he&#8217;s ever been happier than me when United won the Champions League in the last minute of extra time) and the other &#8211; Richard Layard -  is a leading academic on happiness, which may not mean he&#8217;s such a good practitioner.  What I found interesting was the summary table that the piece ended with, boiling down the essence of both men&#8217;s wisdom on how to be happy:  For the monk, the golden rules were:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Learn to meditate / Cultivate altruism / Practise mindfulness / Make space in your life for spirituality / Find a genuine spiritual teacher</em></p></blockquote>
<p>For the academic, they were:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Be socially connected / Be physically active / Take notice of your surroundings and savour them / Keep learning / Give regularly</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The similarities are striking. Happiness is partly about being content within the Self (meditation, exercise, learning) partly about being in touch with the &#8216;big Other&#8217; (engaging in a spirituality, being mindful of our environment) and partly about engaging with &#8216;the other&#8217; that we meet day to day (altruism, generosity, social connection).  It&#8217;s perhaps because I&#8217;m reading this through the lens of my own forthcoming book, but, these three axes of self, God and other are the framework on which I&#8217;ve written &#8211; launching from Jesus&#8217; summary of the Law: love God, and love your neighbour as you love yourself.  Question is then, why are we the unhappiest people yet to have lived?</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kesterbrewin.com%2F2010%2F02%2F09%2Fthe-monk-and-the-academic-how-to-be-happy%2F&amp;title=The%20Monk%20and%20The%20Academic%3A%20How%20to%20be%20Happy"><img src="http://www.kesterbrewin.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kesterbrewin.com/2010/02/09/the-monk-and-the-academic-how-to-be-happy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

